Towards reliable calcification detection: calibration of uncertainty in coronary optical coherence tomography images

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has become increasingly essential in assisting the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD). Image-guided solutions such as Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) are extensively used during the treatment of CAD. However, unidentified calcified regions within a narrowed artery could impair the outcome of the PCI. Prior to treatments, object detection is paramount to automatically procure accurate readings on the location and thickness of calcifications within the artery. Deep learning-based object detection methods have been explored in a variety of applications. The quality of object detection predictions could lead to uncertain results, which are not desirable in safety-critical scenarios. In this work, we implement an object detection model, You-Only-Look-Once v5 (YOLO), on a calcification detection framework within coronary OCT images. We evaluate the uncertainty of predictions based on the expected calibration errors, thus assessing the certainty level of detection results. To calibrate confidence scores of predictions, we implement dependent logistic calibration using each detection result's confidence and center coordinates. With the calibrated confidence score of each prediction, we lower the uncertainty of predictions in calcification detection. Our results show that the YOLO achieves higher precision and recall in comparison with the other object detection model, meanwhile producing more reliable results. The calibrated confidence of prediction results in a confidence error of approximately 0.13, suggesting that the confidence calibration on calcification detection could provide a more trustworthy result, indicating a great potential to assist clinical evaluation of treating the CAD during the imaging-guided procedure.

PDF Abstract

Datasets


Results from the Paper


  Submit results from this paper to get state-of-the-art GitHub badges and help the community compare results to other papers.

Methods


No methods listed for this paper. Add relevant methods here